Historical Context of Infants and toddlers in Care
![]() |
| Baby Farm advert from 1912. http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/tour-through-chicago-baby-farm-in-1912.html |
In the eighteenth and
nineteenth century Infants and toddlers were being looked after
by mothers in the family home. Homemaking and raising children was considered to
be the traditional role for women. Adams, Openshaw and Hamer (2005) give a
vivid description of the mother’s role in Aotearoa New Zealand. They describe
how there was a lack of provision for ‘early childhood care and education’ and that
the society norm, reflected the dominate discourse of the era, was that a
mother’s place was at home, caring and educating their children (p. 80).
Many women in those early times had
the added benefit of extended family living close by who could help out with
childcare whenever needed. Unfortunately some women did not have an extended
support system. As there were no state funded benefits to support mothers to
stay at home mothers had to go out into the workforce to earn money to survive
(Adams, Openshaw & Hamer, 2005; Ministry of Culture and Heritage, 2014).
In the early 19th
century many families did not have and could not afford to pay for quality early
childhood care such as nannies or governesses, who were experienced in the care
and education of very young children. Some parents had no choice but to pay a
neighbour or someone from the local area to have the children whilst the mother
and/or father worked (Adams, Openshaw & Hamer, 2005; Ministry for Culture
and Heritage, 2014).
Adams, Openshaw and Hamer
(2005) describe how these ‘back yard early childhood services’, or as they were
later known ‘baby farmers’, who were completely unregulated by any governing body, and had a free rein in how infants and toddlers were treated. Many baby
farmers lacked the skills or experience to cope with the care and education of
the infants and toddlers. As a result many children suffered neglect by carers
who were untrained and unqualified for the role they had taken on (Adams et
al., 2005; Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2014; Wikipedia, 2014).
Whilst researching about how
infants and toddlers were cared for before regulated early child care became a
society norm. I came across an article about the ‘Angel Maker’ Amelia Dyer from
Brittan in the 1890s (Bovson, 2013). She was an experienced mid-wife and nurse who helped
woman to get rid of unwanted babies (Bovson, 2013). Amelia Dyer was alleged to have murdered 400
babies before she was tried, convicted and put to death (Bovson, 2013). Another
interest character in New Zealand’s early history was Williamina (Minnie) Dean,
the Winton baby farmer, who was the first and only woman in New Zealand’s
history to be put to death for her baby farming malpractices. Minnie’s
deliberate, repetitively neglectful acts resulted in many infant and toddler
illnesses and deaths (Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2014).
As a result in the rising
trend of baby farming and the suspicious deaths of young children, the practice
of baby farming came out into the open with newspapers reporting on
‘high-profile British and Australian court cases in the 1800s (Ministry for
Culture and Heritage, 2014, p.2). The cases brought into stark clarity the
‘sinister practices of baby farmers’ bringing into suspicion all who looked
after children for money ( (Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2014).
The newspaper revelations and court cases bought about the State passing the Infant life protection Act of 1893. This act regulated all
individuals who received payment for the care of very young children. They had
to become ‘licensed as foster homes and were (now) subject to police inspection' (Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2014, p. 2).
Reading back over what I written I reflect on my early years as a young mother and I am glad that in New Zealand we have many wonderful support systems available to help out during the tough times. I have to wonder what would drive a person to choose to be a baby farmer that neglected or killed innocent children. Amazingly many were trained in birthing and caring for sick people, but still deliberately neglected or killed newborn babies, infants and
toddlers ((Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2014). As a mother and an early childhood teacher I just cannot understand
how people could and still do treat children in this way.
Links
Amelia Dyer
Links
Amelia Dyer
Minnie Dean
Baby Farming
References
Adams, P., Openshaw, R., & Hamer, J. (2005). Education and society in
Aotearoa New Zealand. (2nd ed.). North Shore, New Zealand: Nelson
Cengage Learning.
Bovson, M. (2013). Angel Maker Amelia Dyer snuffed out the lives of an
estimated 400 babies in Brittan. Daily News. Retrieved from
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/justice-story/amelia-dyer-killed-400-
babies-late-1800s-article-1.1360132
St. Estephe. (2013). The unknown history of Misandry. Retrieved from
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/tour-through-chicago-baby-farm-in-
1912.html
Ministry for Culture and Heritage. (2014). Baby farmers. Retrieved from
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/culture/baby-farmers
Wikipedia (2014). Baby farming. Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_farming

I found this really interesting to read about. The treatment from 'baby farmers' you have discussed from the 1800's was disgusting. Their would be permanent effects that children would have effecting their overall development. Even unqualified carers who were good to the children, they still do not have knowledge on how to teach and care for a child meaning they do not meet their full potential.
ReplyDelete